The Indian Bar Association issued a legal notice to WHO Scientist Soumya Swaminathan for allegedly “influencing the public against” and “conducting a disinformation campaign against Ivermectin”.
The COVID agenda must be halted! Our goal is to educate our government and demand that mainstream media refrain from spreading misinformation to the public. It’s high time the government should listen to our Experts from Qvive Network about how to avoid spreading fear in the public. Whereas our Qvive continues to provide accurate information on covid agenda and we strongly believe in Truth, Honesty, and Transparency.
Does she not know that millions of people have died from vaccine-related illnesses? In this video, a WHO scientist uses faulty data analysis and twists it to make her point. After that, Manjunath, one of our Qvive journalists, asks WHO scientists about the faulty RT PCR test kits from World Integrated Trade Solution sold worldwide in 2017 and 2018 before Covid 19.
Soumya Swaminathan scared of Qvive’s question, Swaminathan surrounded by Qvive’s questions on Covid vaccine
The new COVID-19 disease appeared in China towards the end of 2019. That’s why it was named COVID-19, which is an acronym for Corona Virus Disease 2019. Data from the World Integrated Trade Solution, however, shows something astonishing:
More Information:
“Covid-19 vaccination can induce multiple sclerosis” Dr John Campbell breaks it down.
In fact, Dr. Soumya Swaminathan should seek advice from UHO about the risks and benefits.
The UHO(Universal Health Organization) experts call on the WHO to clarify the Covid-19 narrative on the Qvive Network and they urge the public to ask the same questions.
1. Was Covid-19 a pandemic?
2. Is vaccine-induced immunity better than natural immunity?
3. Was asymptomatic transmission significant?
4. Does immunity correspond only to antibodies?
5. Are Covid-19 vaccine adverse events reported as they should be?
6. Do the Covid-19 vaccines prevent transmission?
7. Are the Covid-19 vaccines safe?
8. Are Covid-19 vaccines the only solution?
9. Were Covid-19 vaccine mandates legal or ethical?
10. Is WHO’s pandemic treaty warranted?
11. Was the PCR test fit for the purpose of detecting Covid-19?
12. Did masks prevent Covid spread or promote anxiety spread?
13. Did the lockdown save lives or crush lives?
14. Was censorship during Covid-19 management warranted?
Universal Health Organization: www.uho.org.in
The Print, 12 June, 2021:
The Indian Bar Association served a legal notice to chief scientist at the World Health Organization, Dr Soumya Swaminathan, for “influencing the public against” and “running a disinformation campaign against Ivermectin” — a popular anti-parasitic drug prescribed for Covid-19 patients.
The IBA’s 51-page notice, sent on 25 May, calls Swaminathan’s statements “highly unconscionable, misleading and issued with ulterior purposes and deliberate intention to underplay the effectiveness of Ivermectin in treating the Covid-19 patients as well as its use as a prophylaxis and to dissuade people from using this drug by creating doubts in the minds of people around safety of Ivermectin”.
The Indian Bar Association has called for action under sections 302 (punishment for murder), 304 (II) (culpable homicide not amounting to murder), 88 (act not intended to cause death), 120 (B) (party to criminal conspiracy) and 34 (acts done by several persons in furtherance of a common intention) “and other provisions of the Indian Penal Code and under Disaster Management Act, 2005”.
“The legal notice is just the first step. We are going to be taking it forward. There are forces working to repress Ivermectin for reasons mentioned in the notice,” said Dipali Ojha, the author of the notice and head of the IBA’s legal cell.
What the notice is based on
The IBA, in it’s legal notice, claims the drug, “has brought back few critically ill COVID-19 patients from the doors of death” by citing three case studies of “miraculous recovery of critically ill COVID-19 patients,” from the U.S. It also claims that the Indian Council for Medical Research (ICMR) treatment guidelines recommend the use of the drug in mild and moderate patients.
The notice accuses Swaminathan of deliberately dismissing the drug, “in desperate hope to dissuade people of India from discovering the effectiveness of Ivermectin and that they keep falling sick and are available as a huge market,” for newer drugs that may be given Emergency Use Authorisation (EUA).
“You (Swaminathan) have abused your position as the Chief Scientist at WHO to adversely influence the people including medical doctors and scientists, by trying to impose upon them the fact that WHO does not support the use of Ivermectin either as prophylactic or in treatment of COVID-19,” reads the notice. “It seems that you have deliberately opted for deaths of people to achieve your ulterior goals.”
The IBA’s notice is, however, based on contested scientific research.
The IBA uses the research findings of two organisations — the US-based ‘Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance’ as well as the ‘British Ivermectin Recommendation Development Panel’ — to back up its claims on the benefits of Ivermectin.
Source: The Print
Also Read:
Qvive.in passionate about bringing you the most accurate and reliable information possible. Our dedication to honesty and transparency sets us apart – you can always trust that we’re delivering what is right and true. With a keen focus on social relevance, we aim to provide the most credible information available.
Join us in our mission to prioritize accuracy and reliability. Support Qvive.in by following us and spreading the word! Together, we can make a difference.
Stay informed. Stay empowered. Support Qvive.in.