Universal Health Organisation (UHO) Weekly Newsletter – 28 November 2025

Face Saving Fake Covid Inquiry Report by UK: Setting the stage for Pandemic Treaty?

Website: https://uho.org.in

Download: https://uho.org.in/nl/2025-11-28-newsletter.pdf (copy and paste the link)

In a recent newsletter, Dr. Amitav Banerjee, the Chairperson of the Universal Health Organisation, discussed a critical report from the UK regarding the COVID-19 pandemic response. This report, which spans 800 pages, raised significant concerns about the way governments handled the pandemic and produced claims that could affect global COVID policies.

The UK Covid Inquiry Report

• Release Details: The UK Government’s Covid Inquiry report, spanning 800 pages and costing £200 million, was published on 20 November 2025. It incorporates testimonies from a wide range of stakeholders, including politicians, health experts, and families affected by the pandemic.
• Critical Conclusions: The inquiry concluded that the UK government’s response was “too little, too late,” suggesting that 23,000 lives could have been saved with an earlier lockdown. The inquiry’s chair, Heather Hallett, criticized delays and the lack of sufficient early measures like contact tracing and quarantine.
• “Behavioural Fatigue” Misconception: The report countered claims from key advisers about the public’s inability to adhere to long-term restrictions, indicating that this notion lacked scientific support and hindered timely action.

UHO’s Reservations on the Inquiry

The UHO expressed several concerns regarding the conclusions drawn by the inquiry:

1. Assumption of Lockdowns Saving Lives: The claim that lockdowns were lifesaving does not consider the broader collateral damage, potentially leading to increased mortality rates.
2. Reliability of Modelling Studies: The inquiry relied heavily on modelling from Imperial College London, which may not accurately reflect real-world outcomes due to its assumptions.
3. Omission of Collateral Damages: The adverse effects of lockdowns on education, employment, and mental health were overlooked, with a need for a more comprehensive analysis of these factors.
4. Flaws in Death Certifications: The report failed to address issues in death certification processes during the pandemic, which may have inflated the perceived lethality of COVID-19.
5. Inconsistent Lethality Across Demographics: The inquiry did not sufficiently acknowledge that younger, healthier populations faced significantly less risk from the virus compared to the elderly and those with comorbidities.
6. Vaccine Safety Concerns: It notably omitted discussions around adverse effects from vaccines, such as those associated with the AstraZeneca vaccine, which has faced legal scrutiny due to its side effects.
7. Potential Risks for Future Pandemic Responses: UHO warned that the report’s recommendations could encourage future governments to impose strict lockdowns, setting the stage for international agreements, like a potential WHO Pandemic Treaty.

The UHO argues that the report represents a “face-saving” effort by the UK government that may embolden other nations to gloss over their own pandemic mismanagement under the guise of scientific endorsement. They advocate for rigorous scrutiny from scientists, civil society, and legal experts to challenge its conclusions publicly.

The UK Covid Inquiry Report highlights significant governance failings, and the UHO calls for a critical assessment of its overall impact, particularly concerning lockdown measures and their broader societal implications. This discourse is vital for crafting effective pandemic preparedness strategies that prioritize health without compromising societal integrity.

Also Read: