In fact, she and sponsored media are going to face prosecution.
Reply to be filed before 12th August.
In a decisive turn of events, the Hon’ble Court has issued notice to actress Rhea Chakraborty, directing her to submit her reply by 12th August 2025, pursuant to findings recorded in the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) report dated 20.03.2025. The notice pertains to allegations of filing a false and malicious FIR against Sushant Singh Rajput’s sisters—Priyanka Singh and Meetu Singh—and Dr. Tarun Kumar, a senior medical officer with the central government.
CBI Report Unmasks Conspiracy: FIR Filed by Rhea Found False, Frivolous & Baseless
The CBI Report dated 20.03.2025 has categorically concluded that the FIR lodged by Rhea Chakraborty against Sushant’s family members and doctor was false, baseless, and vindictively motivated. The report states that:
- The allegations were frivolous, fabricated, and lacked any material or legal foundation.
- The FIR was filed with malicious intent, constituting gross misuse of police and prosecutorial machinery.
- No evidence was found to support the charge of abetment to suicide, and the FIR itself amounted to criminal misconduct.
High Court Already Quashed FIR Against Meetu Singh
Reinforcing the CBI’s findings, the Hon’ble Bombay High Court had already quashed the FIR against Meetu Singh, observing:
“The allegations were without any prima facie evidence and failed to disclose commission of any cognizable offence.”
This judicial order serves as a binding acknowledgment that the FIR itself was a weaponized legal process, used to falsely implicate grieving family members of Sushant Singh Rajput.
Impending Prosecution: Rhea & Political Conspirators May Face Criminal Trial
If the Hon’ble Court accepts the CBI’s findings, Rhea Chakraborty and other co-conspirators will face criminal prosecution under multiple sections of the Indian Penal Code, including:
- Section 195 – False or fabricated evidence
- Section 192 – Fabrication of false evidence
- Section 166 – Public servant disobeying law
- Section 167 – Framing incorrect documents
- Section 409 – Criminal breach of trust by public servant
- Section 120B – Criminal conspiracy
- Section 107 – Abetment of offence
- Section 24 – Acts done with dishonest intention
Punishment under several of these provisions extends up to life imprisonment.
Additionally, if Rhea Chakraborty now files any affidavit before the Court falsely reaffirming her malicious FIR, she may attract further prosecution for playing fraud upon the Court, submitting false evidence, and committing offences under Sections 191–193 IPC, relating to perjury and obstruction of justice.
Who May Face Prosecution Based on Evidence?
According to available material and judicial records, the following individuals may face criminal trial and custodial liability:
- Rhea Chakraborty
- Aditya Thackeray (then Maharashtra Minister)
- Uddhav Thackeray (former Chief Minister of Maharashtra)
- Anil Deshmukh (former Home Minister of Maharashtra)
- Senior Police Officers involved in suppressing and distorting the case records
These individuals are alleged to have colluded to protect the real culprits and instead diverted the investigation toward Sushant’s family under politically motivated and unlawful pressure.
Media Fraud Exposed: “Clean Chit” Theory Is False and Malicious
Multiple media houses falsely reported that the CBI had given a “clean chit” to Rhea Chakraborty. This claim has now been proven false, as the CBI report does not exonerate Rhea; rather, it finds her FIR to be malicious, fabricated, and without evidentiary basis.
The deliberate dissemination of such false information constitutes media fraud and judicial misrepresentation, which is now under judicial scrutiny.
High Court Orders CBI to Respond — Next Hearing on 18th August 2025
The issue has now reached the Division Bench of the Hon’ble Bombay High Court, where Criminal Writ Petition No. 3109 of 2025 is listed for final hearing on 18th August 2025.
The Court has issued the following directions:
- The CBI has been ordered to file its affidavit in reply, detailing the status of prosecution against Rhea Chakraborty, the media persons, and others involved in the spread of false and misleading information.
- Among those under scrutiny for falsely invoking CBI’s name to mislead the public are:
- Aditya Thackeray
- Rajdeep Sardesai
- Editors and management of certain media houses
These individuals may face contempt proceedings and prosecution under Sections 191, 192, 193, 500 IPC and Section 2(c), 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, for spreading falsehoods, prejudicing ongoing judicial proceedings, and obstructing the course of justice.
This development marks a critical moment in the pursuit of truth and justice in the Sushant Singh Rajput case, exposing the fabricated narratives, institutional misuse, and political shielding that followed his tragic demise.
The forthcoming dates—12th August for Rhea’s reply, and 18th August for the High Court hearing—may prove pivotal in unmasking the real perpetrators and restoring public faith in the justice system.
Ref: https://rashidkhanpathan.com/slap-on-rhea-chakraborty-and-sponsored-media-court-issues-notice-after-cbi-declares-her-complaint-as-false-media-lie-exposed-no-clean-chit-given-to-her/
Also Read: