Tuesday, July 14, 2026

Who win in the Nari Shakti Vandana Amendment Act case in Parliament?

Date:

Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s government called a special session of Parliament to pass the Women’s Reservation Amendment (Nari Shakti Vandana Amendment Act) on April 17th, failing to pass it. Prior to this, the ruling party and the opposition debated the matter on April 16th and 17th. During this period, the opposition repeatedly criticized the ruling party, while the ruling party struggled to counter. The Prime Minister even took up the matter with the opposition parties, telling them to pass the Nari Shakti Vandana Amendment Act and give them all the credit. He would spend money from the government treasury to publish advertisements. Meanwhile, Leader of the Opposition Rahul Gandhi, while bribing the ruling parties, even called Prime Minister Narendra Modi a magician and issued a virtual challenge, stating that under no circumstances would he allow the Narendra Modi-led government to pass the Women’s Reservation Amendment Act (WRA). Following a division of votes in the House, Rahul Gandhi’s words came true, and the Nari Shakti Vandan Act failed to pass in the Lok Sabha due to the Narendra Modi government’s inability to secure a two-thirds majority.

This sparked a major battle. Led by BJP women MPs, NDA women MPs began protesting in the Parliament complex, accusing the opposition of denying women their due in Parliament. Rahul Gandhi took the lead on behalf of the opposition. He posted several tweets accusing Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s government of usurping the rights of the southern states in Parliament by resorting to delimitation under the guise of the Nari Shakti Vandan Amendment Act and deceiving SC, ST, and OBC communities. Samajwadi Party leader Akhilesh Yadav questioned the Narendra Modi government’s denial of Muslim women’s rights. This begs the question: who ultimately won this political battle? Was it the opposition coalition led by Leader of the Opposition Rahul Gandhi, which prevented the passage of the Nari Shakti Vandan Amendment Act in the Lok Sabha, or the ruling party led by Prime Minister Narendra Modi, which was threatening to divide the opposition if the Nari Shakti Vandan Amendment Act were passed?

From the perspective of women’s reservation in Parliament, or the Nari Shakti Vandan Act, neither the opposition coalition led by Rahul Gandhi nor the ruling coalition led by Narendra Modi have won or lost despite the Nari Shakti Vandan Amendment Act being passed in the Lok Sabha on April 17th. I say this because, despite the Nari Shakti Vandan Amendment Act not being passed by the Lok Sabha, it remains fully intact after being passed by both houses of Parliament in 2023, signed by President Draupadi Murmu, and notified on April 16, 2026. The only difference is that it will now come into effect not with the 2029 general elections but with the general elections to be held in2034.

The opposition alliance led by Rahul Gandhi may see victory in having caught the charismatic trick of Narendra Modi and, for the first time, preventing him from passing an act on the strength of such charisma despite not having a sufficient majority. Now, with this knowledge, they will continue to defeat Narendra Modi in Parliament again and again. Despite this, the Nari Shakti Vandan Act, which became law in 2023 and was notified on April 17th, will only be implemented in the general elections to be held after 2034, after delimitation. Even then, there will be no caste-based classification of women; only SC and ST women will benefit from horizontal reservation. If their attempt to woo OBCs and South Indians under this pretext is successful, then their efforts will be considered a victory. This will be tested in the elections in West Bengal and Tamil Nadu. If the opposition alliance receives more votes from these groups in these two states than before, then it will be considered a victory. Otherwise, it will be considered a defeat because of the Nari Shakti Vandan Amendment Act, which they prevented from being passed in the Lok Sabha.

Now let’s turn to the ruling coalition led by Narendra Modi, which, despite lacking a majority in the House, has, on numerous occasions, managed to secure passage of legislation through emotional speeches and charismatic maneuvers, breaking through opposition alliances. However, this time, neither their emotionalism nor their miracles worked in passing the Nari Vandan Amendment Act. It wasn’t that Narendra Modi or Amit Shah were unable to grasp this. They knew they lacked a sufficient majority, and therefore, the Nari Shakti Vandan Amendment Act would be impossible to pass in Parliament. Despite this, if they dared to introduce this Act, there was a hidden plot behind it. And what’s hidden? When the Nari Shakti Bandhan Amendment Act was being debated in the Lok Sabha, several BJP leaders, including Narendra Modi and Amit Shah, openly warned Rahul Gandhi and opposition leaders that if they didn’t help pass the Act, they would face the wrath of women. This means that their underlying plan was to use this Act as a pretext for delimitation to proportionally increase the number of MPs in the northern states where the BJP has a stronghold. So that even if they win fewer seats in the southern states in the 2029 general elections, they will still gain central power based on the increased seats in the northern states. And even if this Nari Shakti Vandan Amendment Act fails to be passed in the House, they will further strengthen their hold among women by accusing the opposition of undermining their interests, thereby gaining political strength in the 2029 elections and in various state elections held before then. Women play a significant role in the victory of BJP MPs and MLAs, and they also offer various inducements to women through their schemes to win them over. Overall, the BJP saw a potential advantage in either the passage or the failure of the Nari Shakti Bandhan Act. However, if passed, the double benefit would have been reduced to a single benefit in the form of women’s support. However, whether the support of women in the West Bengal elections would translate into winning legislative seats remains to be seen, as West Bengal Chief Minister and TMC President Mamata Banerjee has a strong hold on women, Muslims, and other communities. Furthermore, if women in West Bengal and Tamil Nadu become aware that the Narendra Modi-led NDA coalition has introduced this new Shakti Bandhan Amendment Act solely to attract female voters, then just as in the 2021 Bengal Assembly elections, women perceived it as an insult due to Narendra Modi’s repeated use of phrases like “Didi” (didi) and distanced themselves from the BJP, a similar scenario could occur this time around.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related articles

Congress and ISI connection revealed by an ex high official

RVS Mani, former Under Secretary in the Union Home Ministry, has made sensational allegations against the Congress party....

A video of Shah Rukh Khan’s son Aryan in an inebriated state has gone viral.

Several videos of Shah Rukh Khan's son Aryan Khan in an inebriated state after a private party are...

Data of millions of Indians at stake! Major security flaw in UMANG portal

In the era of Digital India, where government services are available to people at the click of a...

Termites are a threat not only to wooden furniture but also to your health

Whenever we see termites in our home, the first thought that comes to our mind is that our...
news-1701

yakinjp

yakinjp

rtp yakinjp

yakinjp

yakinjp

yakin jp

yakinjp id

maujp

maujp

maujp

\

sabung ayam online

sabung ayam online

SLOT MAHJONG

sabung ayam online

article 838000411

article 838000412

article 838000413

article 838000414

article 838000415

article 838000416

article 838000417

article 838000418

article 838000419

article 838000420

article 838000421

article 838000422

article 838000423

article 838000424

article 838000425

article 838000426

article 838000427

article 838000428

article 838000429

article 838000430

article 838000431

article 838000432

article 838000433

article 838000434

article 838000435

article 838000436

article 838000437

article 838000438

article 838000439

article 838000440

article 838000441

article 838000442

article 838000443

article 838000444

article 838000445

article 838000446

article 838000447

article 838000448

article 838000449

article 838000450

article 00036

article 00037

article 00038

article 00039

article 00040

article 00041

article 00042

article 00043

article 00044

article 00045

article 00046

article 00047

article 00048

article 00049

article 00050

article 00051

article 00052

article 00053

article 00054

article 00055

article 00056

article 00057

article 00058

article 00059

article 00060

article 00061

article 00062

article 00063

article 00064

article 00065

article 00066

article 00067

article 00068

article 00069

article 00070

article 00071

article 00072

article 00073

article 00074

article 00075

article 0000131

article 0000132

article 0000133

article 0000134

article 0000135

article 0000136

article 0000137

article 0000138

article 0000139

article 0000140

article 0000141

article 0000142

article 0000143

article 0000144

article 0000145

article 0000146

article 0000147

article 0000148

article 0000149

article 0000150

article 0000151

article 0000152

article 0000153

article 0000154

article 0000155

article 0000156

article 0000157

article 0000158

article 0000159

article 0000160

article 0000161

article 0000162

article 0000163

article 0000164

article 0000165

article 0000166

article 0000167

article 0000168

article 0000169

article 0000170

article 2000126

article 2000127

article 2000128

article 2000129

article 2000130

article 2000131

article 2000132

article 2000133

article 2000134

article 2000135

article 2000136

article 2000137

article 2000138

article 2000139

article 2000140

article 2000141

article 2000142

article 2000143

article 2000144

article 2000145

article 2000146

article 2000147

article 2000148

article 2000149

article 2000150

article 2000151

article 2000152

article 2000153

article 2000154

article 2000155

article 2000156

article 2000157

article 2000158

article 2000159

article 2000160

article 2000161

article 2000162

article 2000163

article 2000164

article 2000165

articel 000000161

articel 000000162

articel 000000163

articel 000000164

articel 000000165

articel 000000166

articel 000000167

articel 000000168

articel 000000169

articel 000000170

articel 000000171

articel 000000172

articel 000000173

articel 000000174

articel 000000175

articel 000000176

articel 000000177

articel 000000178

articel 000000179

articel 000000180

articel 000000181

articel 000000182

articel 000000183

articel 000000184

articel 000000185

articel 000000186

articel 000000187

articel 000000188

articel 000000189

articel 000000190

articel 000000191

articel 000000192

articel 000000193

articel 000000194

articel 000000195

articel 000000196

articel 000000197

articel 000000198

articel 000000199

articel 000000200

news-1701