Friday, July 5, 2024

“Seeking Justice: The PIL that Calls for Aditya Thackeray’s Arrest in the Disha Salian and Sushant Singh Rajput Case”

Date:

: A Public Interest Litigation (PIL) has been filed in the Bombay High Court, seeking directions to the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) to arrest Aditya Thackrey in relation to an ongoing investigation and start his custodial interrogation in a case related to murder of Disha Saliyan, Sushant Singh Rajput and also charges of sexual abuses of children and child trafficking.

The PIL filed in the Bombay High Court for directions to arrest Aditya Thackrey demonstrates the importance of public participation in the legal process. It highlights the significance of transparency, accountability, and trust in our judicial system. The court’s decision and the subsequent actions taken by the CBI will determine the outcome of this case and shape the perception of justice in the eyes of the citizens.

Download: PIL for Disha Salian and Sushant Singh Rajput Case

Petition is filed by ‘Supreme Court & High Court Litigants Association of India’, through its president Sh. Rashid Khan Pathan.

Petitioner requested action against CBI officials responsible for deliberate delaying the investigation and helping the accused by their act of commission and omission.

CLICK HERE

Petitioner asked High Court to direct CBI to submit their reply and status report with one month on crucial 16 points.

The prayers of the petitioner reads thus;

“Request: It is therefore, humbly requested to this Hon’ble Court for;

i) To direct Respondent No. 1, C.B.I. to immediately start the custodial interrogation of the accused Aditya Thackeray and others and submit the detailed report on each points and more particularly on 15 points mentioned in para 47 of this petition within a period of one month;

ii) To direct Respondent No. 1 Director CBI, to register an FIR under section 166, 218, 201, 409, 120(B) & 34 of the Indian Penal Code against the accused investigation officers who are guilty of their acts of omission and commission in helping the accused to run away from the clutches of law;

iii) To direct Advocate General or any state officer to file contempt petition before the Hon’ble Supreme Court under Section 2(b), 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 r/w 129, 142 of the Constitution of India against concerned CBI officials who had acted in wilful disregard and defiance of the specific directions given by Hon’ble Supreme Court in the present case and thereby are guilty of willful disregard and defiance of specific directions given by Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Rhea Chakraborty v. State of Bihar, (2020) 20 SCC 184;

iv)      Pass any other order which is just and proper in the interest of justice, equity and good conscience.

v)       The Cost of this Petition be provided.”

The crucial 15 points which CBI has to answer are as below;

“Central Bureau of investigation (CBI) needs to submit the specific report on following.

(i) Investigations done on Mobile location dated 8th June 2020 of Disha Salian, Aditya Thackrey, Rahul Kamal, Sachin Waze, Suraj Pancholi, Ekta Kapoor and all others within 100 meters of said area who are known/connected to each other.

(ii) Investigations done on Mobile locations dated 13th & 14th June of Sushant Singh Rajput, Rhea Chakraborty, Aditya Thackrey, Arbaz Khan, Sandeep Singh, Showik Chakraborty and all others who were connected with each other’s and within the 100 meters area.

(iii)  Details of investigation done regarding serious allegations made by Shri. Nitesh Rane regarding child trafficking, child abuses at the residence of Shri. Sooraj Pancholi and it’s connection with Aditya Thackrey.

(iv) CCTV footage of all other nearby societies and traffic surveillances, at the relevant time to find out the passing of car of Shri Aditya Thackrey & others including police personal accompanying with him.

(v) The details of injuries on the dead body of Shri Sushant Singh Rajput including face and other body parts and various fractures.

(vi) Investigation on the Statement of eye-witness of murder of Disha Salian, which was published by various news channel such as News-19, Republic Bharat etc.

(vii) Investigation on the statement of Mortuary attendant Shri. Roopkumar Shah, who had done the post-mortem of Shri Sushant Singh Rajput.

(viii) Details of investigations of accused police officials who created a story that file of Disha Saliyan’s case was deleted.

(ix) Investigation of security guards and society officials regarding deleting of the CCTV footage and attendance register of 7th & 8th June in society, where Disha was murdered.

(x) Investigation of Dr. Sudhir Gupta and others for preparing forged post mortem report. Verifying his contradictory statement made to media and also the investigation of issues raised by Shri Subramanyam Swamy.

(xi) Details of investigation on the allegations by Cabinet Minister Shri Narayan Rane that the then Chief Minister Shri Uddhav Thackrey had contacted him to save Aditya Thackrey from this murder case and not to mention about Aditya’s car found present on the murder spot.

[Link:https://x.com/Sinhjee/status/1501078049059917824?t=NFsqe1W8F2vSmBiTtNms5g&s=08

Dated: 8.03.2022]

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/90022666.cms?utm_source=contentofinterest&utm_medium=text&utm_campaign=cppst

(xii) Details of statements of all eye-witnesses present at the flat of Shri Sushant Singh Rajput & Miss Disha Salian on 14th June, 8th June or on earlier days.

(xiii) Details of investigation regarding 44 phone calls between Aditya Thackeray and Rhea Chakraborty on the day of murder of Shri Sushant Singh Rajput.

(xiv) Details of calls of Rhea Chakraborty with Aditya Thackeray & Ors., on 7th & 8th June 2020.

Also, details of the investigation on the issue as to why on the day of the murder of Disha Salian i.e. on 8th June 2020 Rhea left the Sushant’s home.

(xv) Details of investigation and action on false explanation given by Aditya Thackeray that on the day of Disha’s murder, he was in hospital to see his grandfather and he is not having any relations with Rhea Chakraborty.”

Now the Next here

For more details visit:-

http://www.citizenscourtofindia.com/

Also Read:

Previous article
Next article

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related articles

The Al Jazeera Ban in Israel and the Battle for Independent Journalism in the Middle East

Jerusalem, Israel - The Israeli Parliament, the Knesset, has advanced a bill that would make permanent a law...

Opposing the Three New Criminal Laws – Members Take a Stand

The recent implementation of new criminal codes in India has raised concerns among rights activists, and legal experts...

Ring, Ring, Regulatory Challenges:  Analyzing the Implications of India’s Telecommunications Act of 2023

India's newly enacted Telecommunications Act, 2023, has sparked controversy and fueled anxieties about its potential impact on fundamental...