Friday, June 14, 2024

The Supreme Court says demonetization was valid; 1 Judge Disagrees.

Date:

The center is required to take action after consultation with the Central Board of RBI and there was a consultation between the two for six months, the judges said.

The Supreme Court backed Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s 2016 notes ban today in a landmark 4-1 majority judgment and said it was “not relevant” whether the objective of the overnight ban was achieved. One judge disagreed, calling the move “unlawful”.

Here are the top 10 points on this big story

  1. A constitution bench said the central government’s November 8, 2016 order to ban ₹ 1,000 and ₹ 500 currency notes is valid and the decision-making process could not be faulted just because the Centre initiated the move.
  2. The Centre said the court, is required to act in consultation with the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) and there is an “inbuilt safeguard”. This consultation did take place for six months, four of the five judges said.
  3. It is “not relevant” whether the objective was achieved or not, the Supreme Court ruled, adding that the period of 52 days given to exchange the banned notes was not unreasonable. “There has to be great restraint in matters of economic policy. The court cannot supplant the wisdom of the executive with its wisdom,” said Justice BR Gavai, reading out the order.
  4. In a strong dissenting judgment, Justice BV Nagarathna called the notes ban initiated by the Centre “vitiated and unlawful” but said the status quo could not be restored now. The move could have been executed through an act of Parliament, said the judge.
  5. The demonetization order was “an exercise of power contrary to law and unlawful”, said the judge, noting that the entire exercise was carried out in 24 hours.
  6. The problems associated with demonetization make one wonder whether the central bank had visualized these,” said Justice Nagarathna.
  7. She said documents and records submitted by the Centre and the RBI, which included phrases like “As desired by the Central Government”, show there was “no independent application of mind by the RBI”.
  8. Some 58 petitions challenged the Centre’s decision to ban ₹1,000 and ₹500 currency notes overnight. ₹10 lakh crore was wiped out of circulation by the move.
  9. Petitions argued that it was not a considered decision and caused immense hardships to millions of citizens, who were forced to queue up for cash.
  10. The government had argued that the court cannot decide on a case when no tangible relief can be granted. It would be like “putting the clock back” or “unscrambling a scrambled egg”, the center said. It also said demonetization was a “well-considered” decision and part of a larger strategy to combat the menace of fake money, terror financing, black money, and tax evasion.

Source: NDTV

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related articles

PCR Testing is not accurate for detecting Bird Flu and CDC says one of the symptoms of bird flu is NO SYMPTOMS!!

Misinformation can be harmful and can undermine public health efforts. It is crucial to rely on credible sources...

ALERT! U-WIN Program: Bill Gates-Backed Tech for Seamless Mass Vaccination Registration

The Story of CoWIN: How A Vaccination Strategy for Digital India Failed Why was a wholly digital platform like...

HOLES IN HEAVEN: HAARP and Advances In Tesla Technology

Using HAARP, the military can focus a billion-watt pulsed radio beam into our upper atmosphere, ostensibly for ionospheric...