Today, we will look at another recent study touting “antibody transfer to infants,” which incidentally shows the same dose-response relationship and greater fetal damage for Moderna, a higher-dose vaccine than Pfizer.

( https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2807260 )

The study followed 76 pregnant women and recorded health outcomes for their newborns.

Despite falsely claiming “no adverse outcomes,” the study shows plenty of adverse outcomes for infants – following the dose-response pattern.

Take a look at Supplement 1:

https://archive.ph/wpwnB

You can see how much worse the higher-dose Moderna vaccine is compared to the lower-dose (but also harmful) Pfizer vaccine.

For example, 8.8% of infants born to Moderna-vaccinated mothers had congenital anomalies, almost four times worse than Pfizer-vaccinated mothers and several times the historical rate.

EDIT: Our reader Nathan pointed out that I did not mention pre-eclampsia, which normally affects only 4.6% of mothers

( https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-022-26606-z ), but in our case, was 25%.

17.7% of Moderna infants had to go to NICU (neonatal intensive care unit)! This is twice the normal rate.

( https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8664880/#:~:text=Overall%20crude%20NICU%20admission%20rates,2018%2C%20a%2037%25%20growth.)

Preterm Births

Moderna vaccinated women had four preterm births. While the sample size is small, the preterm births are higher in the Moderna group, confirming the same dose-response relationship where the amount of harm is greater with the higher dose.

The preterm rate is also significantly understated because the study excluded three women who “delivered before completing initial vaccine series,” so those deliveries were preterm:

Of 81 participants enrolled, 5 were excluded after enrollment: 1 terminated pregnancy, 1 received the third vaccine dose prior to delivery, and 3 delivered prior to completing the initial vaccine series.

The study is silent on why exactly one pregnancy was terminated, with the mother excluded from the study data set. Most vaccinations (66 out of 76) were in the second and third trimesters, usually well after abortions are done for family planning purposes. Was the termination due to another congenital anomaly?

Congenital Anomalies

The above-mentioned “anomalies” in children born to vaccinated mothers are serious and disturbing:

I hope the affected infants get appropriate care and become happy and healthy adults.

This study shows the same pattern discussed in my previous two posts on this matter: the Moderna vaccine, having a higher dose than Pfizer, causes more damage to infants.

One of the authors of the above study is familiar to us: the Bill Gates-sponsored Dr. Stephanie Gaw conducted a study designed from the outset NOT to find mRNA vaccines in breast milk.

What’s up with Bill Gates and the CDC?

By pure coincidence, the study that did not find mRNA nanoparticles in breast milk (the no-shedding study), had key scientists sponsored by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. They also received money from the CDC. You can see that Prof. Gaw and Dr. Flaherman were key participants, making the most important decisions and analyses!

Addtional Information:

Bill Gates-Funded Scientists Found NO mRNA in Breast Milk a Year Ago

( https://www.igor-chudov.com/p/bill-gates-funded-scientists-found )

Source: Igor Chudov

Also Read:

• It’s scary! The Evil Gene Therapy COVID-19 Injection Ingredients by Dr. Christiane Northrup.

• Check out this video: Gates says the Covid vaccine is ineffective.

• Fox News Producer Tells All to OMG Journalist about Advertising Pressures and Pfizer

• Dr. Naomi Wolf Uncovers Pfizer’s Depopulation Agenda, as Evidenced by Its Own Documents