Highlights:
- Data from Japan comparing trends of mortality between vaccinated and unvaccinated people raises concerns.
- Sacked members of the CDC advisory panel on immunisation criticise HHS policy in the USA.
- The top US Public Health Expert and Head of the National Institute of Health, Dr Jay
- Bhattacharya says “Covid Appropriate Behaviors” do not work – it is official!
Download: https://uho.org.in/nl/2025-06-20-newsletter.pdf [copy & paste the link]
Website: https://uho.org.in
Dr. Amitabh Banerjee, Chairperson of UHO: We present our newsletter on behalf of UHO. We have some very important and impactful news today—quite sensational, you might say. Although it is not our goal to sensationalize, we aim to verify everything with evidence before presenting it to you. These three news items will certainly make us think deeply.
The first news is from Japan. A large dataset involving 18 million people was analyzed by three experts: an investigative journalist, a very senior professor who is the Director of Research on mRNA vaccines, and a researcher. These three researchers analyzed data comparing vaccinated and unvaccinated groups, and their results were very interesting. They highlight what governments should have done but did not. Even the Japanese government is not analyzing data properly, which is essential when a new vaccine is introduced for emergency use—it must be monitored carefully. This large dataset analysis was conducted on their own initiative.
The second news relates to the USA. In previous newsletters, we explained the turmoil at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in Atlanta, which used to issue the global guidelines. Recently, the new Health Secretary, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., fired 17 members of the Vaccine Advisory Committee because they had strong, long-standing links with pharmaceutical companies. Such conflicts of interest mean that impartial, scientifically based recommendations cannot be expected. Some of those dismissed are now making statements attempting to discredit Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and the new CDC leadership, whose own conflicts of interest are under scrutiny. It is unfortunate that major journals like the British Medical Journal are publishing these statements without proper critical evaluation, which we will discuss further.
The third important update concerns the newly appointed Director of the NIH, Professor Jay Bhattacharya from Stanford University. He admitted that all the COVID-related guidelines—appropriate behaviors, mask mandates, vaccine mandates, lockdowns—lacked a solid scientific basis and caused significant harm. This is a major statement that should prompt the entire world to reflect, though the world remains silent, which we will also explore.
Now, let me elaborate on these points one by one.
First, the Japanese study: the team analyzed data from 18 million people. The team comprises three influential figures: Professor Yasufumi Murakami, a senior research scientist and Vice Director of the Research Center for RNA and mRNA vaccines at Tokyo University; Masako Gana, an investigative journalist; and Kazuhiro Aragaki, a member of the Japanese Parliament. This combination of senior scientific expertise, investigative journalism, and political leadership lends weight to their findings.
Their analysis compared vaccinated and unvaccinated people and followed them over time. They found that three to four months after the last vaccine dose, there was a very high incidence of sudden deaths—mortality rates spiked significantly in the vaccinated group compared to the unvaccinated group, which showed no such peak but rather a normal, steady pattern. The more doses received, the higher the effect observed, with a clear peak appearing between 90 to 120 days after vaccination. They suspect adverse reactions to the COVID vaccines may be the cause of this spike. This is a profound concern because the vaccinated group showed a distinct mortality peak that was absent in the unvaccinated group.
This kind of study has been advocated by UHO for over two years. We have written columns urging governments to conduct similar research because we have the data digitally stored and easily accessible. Yet, the Japanese government itself has not conducted or published such analyses and remains opaque about data transparency. The researchers compiled this data on their own initiative.
We considered potential explanations such as self-selection bias and comorbidities—perhaps sicker people took more vaccine doses, leading to higher death rates among them. However, the pattern observed—a sharp peak in mortality shortly after vaccination—does not fit the spread-out pattern expected if comorbidities alone were responsible. Moreover, similar evidence is emerging from different parts of the world.
For example, in the US Senate hearings held just two weeks ago, Dr. Peter McCullough, one of the world’s leading cardiologists, testified about autopsy series of sudden deaths. He explained that 73.9% of deaths linked to myocarditis—a heart inflammation associated with mRNA and AstraZeneca vaccines—were sudden deaths directly attributable to the COVID vaccines. This further underscores the need for all governments to thoroughly investigate vaccine injuries, especially as these vaccines are still considered experimental and their full trial results have not been disclosed.
Vaccines have been rolled out globally without complete testing, placing many lives at risk. Signals of adverse events are emerging worldwide, yet governments largely ignore these warning signs. This reluctance often stems from fear of admitting mistakes because many parties are involved and implicated.
In 2022, our UHO members published a report in the National Herald documenting patterns of sudden deaths, including data from India and Europe, showing similar spikes. We recommended rigorous studies comparing vaccinated and unvaccinated populations, but time is passing without action. The delay weakens the evidence and risks more harm, just as delayed investigation at an accident or crime scene diminishes clarity.
The second news item concerns those fired from the CDC Vaccine Advisory Committee, including Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who is visibly agitated and making statements. Usually, if an honest scientist is disturbed, journals hesitate to publish their claims immediately. However, medical journals now appear compromised, acting as extensions of pharmaceutical interests, which is deeply troubling.
We will continue to monitor and report on these developments closely.
Also Read:
Latest :