Several major revelations have recently emerged in the ongoing controversy surrounding eyewitnesses in the Disha Salian case. The issue has reignited tensions after the Bombay High Court ordered a CBI investigation in September 2026.
Even before the CBI has begun its investigation, attempts are being made to influence the investigation by intimidating witnesses. Influential individuals are being accused of threatening witnesses and what they are saying.
Nilesh Ojha, the lawyer representing Disha Salian’s father, has claimed in court that he has eyewitnesses who saw several prominent politicians and actors at the scene on the night of the incident. Petitioners and lawyers allege that eyewitnesses and the victim’s family are being continuously intimidated to suppress the case and prevent them from speaking out before the court or the CBI.
These threats include pressure to pressure witnesses into giving false testimony, withdrawing from the case, or remaining silent. They are allegedly threatened with dire consequences or being implicated in false cases to prevent the main accused from being identified. How could this situation impact the case? Influencing or threatening witnesses can have the following serious impacts on the legal process:
Tampering of evidence and statements: If witnesses change or retract their statements out of fear (Hostile Witness), it may be difficult to reach the real culprits.
Changing the direction of the CBI investigation: The Bombay High Court has directed the CBI to register a fresh FIR and investigate with complete independence. In such a situation, the safety of key eyewitnesses and their accurate statements are crucial to the final chargesheet of the case.
Delays in the investigation: If the safety of witnesses is threatened, the court will have to make special arrangements for their protection, which could further prolong legal proceedings.