Monday, July 8, 2024

UIDAI denies having any records on the new Aadhaar generation. RTI reveals deception in Aadhaar enrollment.

Date:

In a recent statement, the Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI) acknowledged that they do not have the reports readily available for fresh first-time Aadhaar generated for people 18 years and above. This revelation has left many individuals wondering about the implications and consequences of this lack of data.

For individuals who are applying for Aadhaar for the first time and are 18 years and above, the inability of UIDAI to provide immediate reports may lead to delays in the generation of their unique identification number. This could potentially create hurdles in accessing essential services and benefits that require an Aadhaar card for verification.
Moreover, the lack of readily available reports raises concerns about the transparency and efficiency of the Aadhaar generation process. It is crucial for UIDAI to address this issue promptly and ensure that the necessary data is accessible to facilitate the timely issuance of Aadhaar cards to eligible individuals.

Qvive opinion: A government organization like UIDAI needs to maintain transparency and provide clear information to the public, especially concerning sensitive data like Aadhaar. The contradicting statements from UIDAI raise concerns about the organization’s credibility and accountability in handling such critical data.

To maintain public trust and credibility, UIDAI must provide accurate and timely information to the public and address any discrepancies promptly. Transparency and accountability are crucial for an organization like UIDAI, which manages sensitive data like Aadhaar and must be upheld to ensure the integrity and reliability of the system.

Related Article:

Aakash Goel, an activist, engineer, management graduate, and chartered financial analyst, recently filed a report. In reply, UIDAI stated that they don’t have the reports readily accessible for newly issued Aadhaar cards for individuals aged 18 and above. They even mentioned that these reports are not readily available, despite the fact that UIDAI publishes them under a different category.[a]

[a] https://uidai.gov.in/images/StateWiseAge_AadhaarSat_Rep_31032023_Projected-2023-Final.pdf

Aadhaar Enrolment: Someone Is Not Telling the Truth, Reveals RTI

The refusal to provide information is getting so brazen that information officers at the Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI) claimed that no reports were available even when UIDAI publishes reports under different heads. It also turns out that information, when provided, raises more questions.

Over the years, most government departments and undertakings have tried to stymie the Right to Information (RTI) Act by finding multiple excuses, ranging from ‘information not available’,  ‘personal information’ or third-party information to deny information to citizens. UIDAI, which is tasked with issuing Aadhaar numbers to resident Indians, has gone a step further. In response to a recent filing by activist Aakash Goel, an engineer, management graduate and chartered financial analyst, UIDAI said it does not have the reports readily available for fresh first-time Aadhaar generated for people 18 years and above. It claimed that ‘No such reports are readily available’ even when UIDAI itself publishes these reports under a different head

Even more astonishing is the vast difference between the information shared by UIDAI in response to the RTI application and the data published on its website. Consider the table below:

During the past eight financial years, UIDAI says it generated 439.6mn (million) fresh, first-time Aadhaar, including Bal Aadhaar for residents. However, it says it does not have any report or data for fresh Aadhaar generated for people aged 18 and above from FY15-16 to FY22-23.

This is not entirely true. UIDAI publishes reports on Aadhaar saturation on its website. As per the report, as of 31 March 2023, the projected population (based on data from the registrar general of India-RGI) of those aged 18 and above was 957.59mn (95.75 crore). UIDAI assigned Aadhaar to 975.66mn residents, crossing the saturation level to 101.9%. The data includes revised population updated between November and December 2021 for Daman & Diu, Dadra and Nagar Haveli, Chandigarh and Puducherry. 

While claiming a saturation level of 101.9% for assigning Aadhaar to those aged 18 and above, UIDAI continues to issue Aadhaar numbers to first-time enrollees, including children. At the same time, it denies data on the fresh enrollment of residents aged 18 and above.

Mr Goel says, “Aadhaar has been transformative for the country, the government and its policies and way of living. It was reported in Mint that in FY20-21, 1.3mn (13 lakh) people of 18 years of age or older, got fresh, first-time enrolment in Aadhaar. Then Financial Express reported that in FY021-22, 5mn (50 lakh) people of 18 years of age or older, got fresh first-time enrolment in the Aadhaar database. It is strange to extremely strange that when an Aadhaar is the basis for school education, ration card, bank account and practically anything for a living, so many people are without an Aadhaar in their 18 years (or more) of life. It clearly reeks of unchecked migration.”

“And since ‘No such reports readily available’ is used to not provide information on half queries, it is very clear that the central public information officer (CPIO) took 18 extra days over 30 days to provide readily available information,” he added.

However, since Mr Goel did not press the matter, Chief Information Commissioner Heeralal Samariya disposed of his second appeal filed under the RTI Act.  

As of 20 February 2024, UIDAI has generated 1.39bn (billion) or 139.19 crore Aadhaar numbers and has updated 891.97mn Aadhaar numbers.

Earlier this month, the Union government informed the Lok Sabha that notwithstanding the 30 June 2023 deadline, as many as 114.8mn holders of permanent account numbers (PANs) have not linked their PAN with Aadhaar and, during the past seven months till 31 January 2024, the government collected Rs601.97 crore as a penalty from PAN-holders.

In a written reply, Pankaj Chaudhary, minister of state for finance, says, “Number of PANs not linked with Aadhaar, excluding exempted categories, is 11.48 crore as of 29 January 2024. The total collection of fee from the persons who have not linked their PAN with Aadhaar is Rs601.97 crore from 1 July 2023 to 31 January 2024.”

At present, there are 702.4mn PAN cardholders in India. Last year in November, responding to a query filed under the Right to Information (RTI) Act, the central board of direct taxes (CBDT) stated that 115mn PAN cards were deactivated for not being linked to Aadhaar. (Read: 11.48 Crore PAN Not Yet Linked with Aadhaar, Govt Collected Rs602 Crore Penalty in 7 Months – https://moneylife.in/article/1148-crore-pan-not-yet-linked-with-aadhaar-govt-collected-rs602-crore-penalty-in-7-months/73315.html )

Last month, in yet another clarification, the UIDAI asked all those concerned to delete the use of Aadhaar as proof of date of birth (DoB) from the list of acceptable documents. UIDAI says it observed that authentication user agencies (AUAs) and know-your-customer (KYC) user agencies (KUAs) are considering and accepting Aadhaar or e-Aadhaar as one of the acceptable documents for proof of date of birth. Following the UIDAI circular, the employees’ provident fund organization (EPFO) decided to remove Aadhaar as proof of date of birth from its list of acceptable documents.

Now That Government Has Admitted to Security Issues with Aadhaar, We Should Demand Better Security

The government recently put out a press release warning citizens from sharing photocopies of their Aadhaar card, as it poses serious security risks. Now that the government is finally waking up and admitting to the risks and problems with Aadhaar, it is time the people demanded better security for their personal biometric data. Watch this week’s video as Sucheta Dalal explains in detail.

Source: MoneyLife, Vova.edu.vn,

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related articles

An expert explains the health risks of the HPV vaccine.

Dr. Sherrill Sellman's concerns about the HPV vaccine are not to be taken lightly. As a respected medical...

The Al Jazeera Ban in Israel and the Battle for Independent Journalism in the Middle East

Jerusalem, Israel - The Israeli Parliament, the Knesset, has advanced a bill that would make permanent a law...

Opposing the Three New Criminal Laws – Members Take a Stand

The recent implementation of new criminal codes in India has raised concerns among rights activists, and legal experts...